Original Research
The impact of agricultural extension on farmers’ technical efficiencies in Ethiopia: A stochastic production frontier approach
Submitted: 25 March 2015 | Published: 29 June 2017
About the author(s)
Kidanemariam G. Gebrehiwot, College of Economics and Management Sciences, University of South Africa, South Africa; Department of Economics, Mekelle University, EthiopiaAbstract
Background: To address the structural food deficit and top down extension system that persisted for decades, the government of Ethiopia has introduced a new extension system, called Participatory Demonstration and Training Extension Systems, which serves more than 80% of the total population. As the program was streamlined to fit the different agro-climatic condition of the country, the extension approach practiced in the Tigray region (research area) was called Integrated Household Extension Program.
Aim: This article reports on research aimed at measuring the technical efficiency levels of extension participants and non-participants; measuring the impact extension service on technical efficiency.
Setting: The research was conducted in the northern part of the country, where agriculture is the main sources of livelihoods. Moisture is the most critical factor in the production system. The land holding size averages 0.5 ha per household compared to above three ha 30 years ago; indicating the high population pressure in the area.
Methods: A sample of 362 agricultural extension service participants and 369 non-participant farm households from the northern part of Ethiopia, participated in the study. The stochastic production frontier technique was used to analyse the survey data and to compute farm-level technical efficiency.
Results: The results showed an average level of technical efficiency of 48%. It is suggested that substantial gains in output and/or decrease in cost can be attained with the existing technology. All the variables included in the model to explain efficiency were found significant and with the expected sign, except education and number of dependants.
Conclusion: The research tried to assess the impact of a new extension service (participatory in nature) on farmers’ productivity in a semi-arid zone, as compared with the conventional extension service and found in the literature areas with relatively better climatic conditions. Hence, if extension administrators could work to uplift the average and below average farmers into better performing farmers level, the overall production and living condition could improve substantially in the research area, and more or less in the rest part of the country.
Keywords
Metrics
Total abstract views: 5675Total article views: 10927
Crossref Citations
1. Revealing the effect of agricultural interventions on technical efficiency: empirical evidence from Indonesian smallholder rice farmers
Yovita Anggita Dewi, Bezawit Adugna Bahru, Manfred Zeller
Agricultural and Food Economics vol: 14 issue: 1 year: 2026
doi: 10.1186/s40100-026-00454-1
2. Measuring the Effect of Agricultural Extension on Technical Efficiency in Crop Farming: Meta-Regression Analysis
Nicolas Lampach, Nguyen Van Phu, Nguyen To The
SSRN Electronic Journal year: 2018
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3208034
3. Impacts of improved agricultural technology adoption on welfare in Africa: A meta-analysis
Tsegaye Mulugeta Habtewold, Almas Heshmati
Heliyon vol: 9 issue: 7 first page: e17463 year: 2023
doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17463
4. Undoing the development army: a paradigm shift from transfer of technology to agricultural innovation system in Ethiopian extension
Yemane Asmelash Gebremariam, Joost Dessein, Beneberu Assefa Wondimagegnhu, Mark Breusers, Lutgart Lenaerts, Enyew Adgo, Steven Van Passel, Amare Sewnet Minale, Jan Nyssen
Environment, Development and Sustainability vol: 27 issue: 3 first page: 6303 year: 2023
doi: 10.1007/s10668-023-04136-6
5. Technical efficiency analysis of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum) production and its determinants in central and southern Oromia region, Ethiopia: stochastic frontiers analysis approach
Tamrat Gebiso Challa, Eihab Fathelrahman, Fresenbet Zeleke Abshiro, Tadele Mamo, Raeda Osman, Getachew Legese Feye
Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems vol: 10 year: 2026
doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2026.1737398
6.
Cereal production practices and technical efficiency among farm households in major “
teff”
growing mixed farming areas of Ethiopia: A stochastic meta-frontier approach
Fisseha Zegeye Birhanu, Abrham Seyoum Tsehay, Dawit Alemu Bimerew
Cogent Economics & Finance vol: 10 issue: 1 year: 2022
doi: 10.1080/23322039.2021.2012986
7. Effects of Radio-Based Extension Services on farmers’ Adoption of Organo-Mineral Fertilizers, Biofertilizers, and Manure in Lesotho
Nthapeliseng Nthama, O. I. Oladele
Journal of Radio & Audio Media vol: 32 issue: 2 first page: 353 year: 2025
doi: 10.1080/19376529.2024.2332714
8. Are agricultural extension systems ready to scale up ecological intensification in East Africa? A literature review with particular attention to the Push-Pull Technology (PPT)
Ellinor Isgren, Yann Clough, Alice Murage, Elina Andersson
Food Security vol: 15 issue: 5 first page: 1399 year: 2023
doi: 10.1007/s12571-023-01387-z
9. Determinants of Farmers’ Level of Interaction with Agricultural Extension Agencies in Northwest Ethiopia
Yemane Asmelash Gebremariam, Joost Dessein, Beneberu Assefa Wondimagegnhu, Mark Breusers, Lutgart Lenaerts, Enyew Adgo, Zemen Ayalew, Amare Sewenet Minale, Jan Nyssen
Sustainability vol: 13 issue: 6 first page: 3447 year: 2021
doi: 10.3390/su13063447
10. The impact of agricultural extension type and form on technical efficiency under transition: An empirical assessment of wheat production in Uzbekistan
Mukhayyo Djuraeva, Ihtiyor Bobojonov, Lena Kuhn, Thomas Glauben
Economic Analysis and Policy vol: 77 first page: 203 year: 2023
doi: 10.1016/j.eap.2022.11.008
11. Factors affecting livestock farmers’ access and level of engagement with extension agencies in Tamil Nadu, India
Jothilakshmi Mani, Narmatha Nachiappan, Akila Natarajan, Thirunavukkarasu Duraisamy
Development in Practice vol: 35 issue: 4 first page: 549 year: 2025
doi: 10.1080/09614524.2025.2472236