Email this article 
Hide
Show all
Original Research
The impact of social grant dependency on smallholder maize producers’ market participation in South Africa: Application of the double-hurdle model
Submitted: 09 September 2015 | Published: 26 May 2017
About the author(s)
Sikhulumile Sinyolo, Economic Performance and Development, Human Sciences Research Council, South AfricaMaxwell Mudhara, Discipline of Agricultural Economics, University of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
Edilegnaw Wale, Discipline of Agricultural Economics, University of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
Abstract
Background: Social grants have become an increasingly popular means of improving the welfare of poor households in South Africa and beyond. While the goals of these transfers are to alleviate current poverty as well as to improve human capital capacity, they also have unintended effects, positive or negative, on beneficiary households. A question that has not been adequately addressed in the literature is the role that social grants play in the efforts to commercialise smallholder farming.
Aim: The aim of this study was to examine the impact of social grant dependency on the incentives of smallholder maize producers to participate in the market.
Setting: The study was done in the rural areas of four districts (Harry Gwala, Umzinyathi, Umkhanyakude and Uthukela) in the KwaZulu-Natal province, South Africa.
Methods: The study adopted a quantitative research design. A total of 984 households were randomly selected from the four districts, of which 774 had planted maize in the previous season. The analysis was done on the 774 farmers who had planted maize. The double-hurdle model was used for statistical analysis.
Results: The results show a negative association between social grant dependency and market participation, suggesting that social grant-dependent households are more subsistent, producing less marketable surplus. Moreover, households with access to social grants sold less quantities of maize in the market, indicating reduced selling incentives.
Conclusion: The study indicates that social grants reduce the incentives of smallholder farmers to commercialise their production activities. The results suggest that, while policies aimed at reducing transaction costs would increase smallholder market participation, attention should be paid on how to reduce social grants’ dis-incentive effects. To reduce spill over effects to unintended household members, the study recommends offering part of the grant as ‘in-kind support’, which is specific to the intended individual beneficiary.
Keywords
Metrics
Total abstract views: 5651Total article views: 15831
Crossref Citations
1. Dryland Fodder Radish Genotypes: Planting Date Effects on Nutritive Value and In-Vitro Dry Matter Degradability in Midlands of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
Lwando Mbambalala, Thamsanqa Doctor Empire Mpanza, Tlou Julius Tjelele, Lusanda Ncisana, Sphesihle Mkhungo, Lucky Sithole, Mpho Siennah Nzeru, Patrick Ngwako Rakau, Zikhona Theodora Rani-Kamwendo, Ntuthuko Raphael Mkhize
Grasses vol: 4 issue: 2 first page: 17 year: 2025
doi: 10.3390/grasses4020017
2. The role of social grants on commercialization among smallholder farmers in South Africa: Evidence from a continuous treatment approach
Sikhulumile Sinyolo, Maxwell Mudhara, Edilegnaw Wale
Agribusiness vol: 35 issue: 3 first page: 457 year: 2019
doi: 10.1002/agr.21601
3. Do Agricultural Machinery Services Facilitate Land Transfer? Evidence from Rice Farmers in Sichuan Province, China
Xi Yu, Xiyang Yin, Yuying Liu, Dongmei Li
Land vol: 10 issue: 5 first page: 466 year: 2021
doi: 10.3390/land10050466
4. “It's not enough:” Local experiences of social grants, economic precarity, and health inequity in Mpumalanga, South Africa
Margaret S. Winchester, Brian King, Andrea Rishworth
Wellbeing, Space and Society vol: 2 first page: 100044 year: 2021
doi: 10.1016/j.wss.2021.100044
5. Assessing the social vulnerability of small-scale farmer's to drought in uMsinga, KwaZulu-Natal
S.J. Lottering, P. Mafongoya, R.T. Lottering
International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction vol: 65 first page: 102568 year: 2021
doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102568
6. Impact of improved maize variety adoption on smallholder farmers’ welfare in Benin
Gbodja Hilaire Houeninvo, Cossi Venant Célestin Quenum, Gbêtondji Melaine Armel Nonvide
Economics of Innovation and New Technology vol: 29 issue: 8 first page: 831 year: 2020
doi: 10.1080/10438599.2019.1669331
7. Impact of land use and land cover change on land degradation in rural semi-arid South Africa: case of the Greater Sekhukhune District Municipality
M. J. Kgaphola, A. Ramoelo, J. Odindi, J-M. Mwenge Kahinda, A. R. Seetal, C. Musvoto
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment vol: 195 issue: 6 year: 2023
doi: 10.1007/s10661-023-11104-0
8. Factors Influencing the Extent of the Commercialization of Indigenous Crops Among Smallholder Farmers in the Limpopo and Mpumalanga Provinces of South Africa
Nonkululeko Thandeka Brightness Zondi, Mjabuliseni Simon Cloapas Ngidi, Temitope Oluwaseun Ojo, Simphiwe Innocentia Hlatshwayo
Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems vol: 5 year: 2022
doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2021.777790
9. Adoption of agricultural technologies among rice farmers in Benin
Gbêtondji Melaine Armel Nonvide
Review of Development Economics vol: 25 issue: 4 first page: 2372 year: 2021
doi: 10.1111/rode.12802
10. Market Participation Decision of Emerging Farmers Under the Land Restitution Programme in Limpopo Province, South Africa
L.M. Maesela, G.M. Senyolo, A. Belete
South African Journal of Agricultural Extension (SAJAE) vol: 51 issue: 4 first page: 87 year: 2023
doi: 10.17159/2413-3221/2023/v51n4a14524
11. Determinants of Nile perch (Lates niloticus) overfishing and its intensity in Lake Victoria, Tanzania: a double-hurdle model approach
Eliaza Mkuna, Lloyd J. S. Baiyegunhi
Hydrobiologia vol: 835 issue: 1 first page: 101 year: 2019
doi: 10.1007/s10750-019-3932-9
12. Farmers’ adaptation to climate change and crop yield: a case of Amuru and Apac districts of Northern Uganda
Francis Atube, Daniel M. Okello, Geoffrey M. Malinga, Martine Nyeko, Ipolto Okello-Uma
International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability vol: 20 issue: 5 first page: 967 year: 2022
doi: 10.1080/14735903.2022.2028400
13. Foreign aid versus support to social entrepreneurs: Reviewing the way of fighting poverty in Zimbabwe
Crispen Karanda, Nuria Toledano
Development Southern Africa vol: 35 issue: 4 first page: 480 year: 2018
doi: 10.1080/0376835X.2018.1482198
14. A Typology of the Level of Market Participation among Smallholder Farmers in South Africa: Limpopo and Mpumalanga Provinces
Simphiwe Innocentia Hlatshwayo, Mjabuliseni Ngidi, Temitope Ojo, Albert Thembinkosi Modi, Tafadzwanashe Mabhaudhi, Rob Slotow
Sustainability vol: 13 issue: 14 first page: 7699 year: 2021
doi: 10.3390/su13147699
15. Genetic and Agronomic Parameter Estimates of Growth, Yield and Related Traits of Maize (<i>Zea mays</i> L.) under Different Rates of Nitrogen Fertilization
Prince Emmanuel Norman, Lansana Kamara, Aloysius Beah, Kelvin Sahr Gborie, Francess Sia Saquee, Sheku Alfred Kanu, Fayia Augustine Kassoh, Yvonne Sylvia Gloria Ethel Norman, Abdul Salaam Kargbo
American Journal of Plant Sciences vol: 15 issue: 04 first page: 274 year: 2024
doi: 10.4236/ajps.2024.154020
16. Social-ecological resilience and community-based tourism in the commonwealth of Dominica
Kristin Weis, Catherine Chambers, Patrick J. Holladay
Tourism Geographies vol: 23 issue: 3 first page: 458 year: 2021
doi: 10.1080/14616688.2021.1878267