Original Research
Competencies for the effective management of legislated business rehabilitations
Submitted: 08 June 2017 | Published: 12 April 2018
About the author(s)
Rajendra Rajaram, School of Accounting, Economics and Commerce, University of KwaZulu-Natal, South AfricaAnesh M. Singh, School of Accounting, Economics and Commerce, University of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
Abstract
Background: In 2011 a new Companies Act (No. 71 of 2008) was implemented in South Africa. A feature of this Act was the introduction of business rescue legislation. Although this legislation was implemented in May 2011, statistics indicate that the success rate for business rescues is approximately only 12%. This low success rate prompted debate relating to the effectiveness, and continued suitability of a legislated business rescue as a mechanism to rehabilitate financially distressed companies. A feature of the business rescue environment in South Africa is the lack of knowledge, necessitating more research in the field.
Aim: Due to the importance of the business rescue practitioner in the overall success of a rescue, the research focused on establishing competencies required to be a successful practitioner.
Setting: The research was undertaken in South Africa between 2015 and 2017.
Methods: A mixed methods research approach was utilised to identify the important competencies of a successful practitioner. A survey was conducted with the membership of the Turnaround Management Association of Southern Africa. The survey was mailed to 130 members and the response rate was 54%. The survey was complemented by undertaking interviews with 7 of the top 10 business rescue practitioners, according to their number of practitioner appointments.
Results: The original contribution to knowledge of this study is the identification of a set of competencies that can be utilised to accredit business rescue practitioners and the emphasis on an accounting qualification and effective cash management skills that a successful practitioner must possess.
Conclusion: The knowledge generated from this research will benefit business rescue practitioners, the financial sector and stakeholders of companies intending to go into a legislated business rehabilitation.
Keywords
Metrics
Total abstract views: 3826Total article views: 5709
Crossref Citations
1. The State of Business Rescue Practitioners Professional Accreditation
Onesmus Ayaya, Marius Pretorius
Sage Open vol: 11 issue: 4 year: 2021
doi: 10.1177/21582440211050397
2. Using practitioners’ voices in developing a business rescue practitioner expert profile
Onesmus Ayaya
Journal of Management and Business Education vol: 7 issue: 2 year: 2024
doi: 10.35564/jmbe.2024.0016
3. Business rescue: Adapt or die
Rajendra Rajaram, Anesh M. Singh, Navitha S. Sewpersadh
South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences vol: 21 issue: 1 year: 2018
doi: 10.4102/sajems.v21i1.2164
4. Building on purposive interpretation outcomes to discern occupational practices from interview-to-the-double results
Onesmus Ayaya
Journal of Management and Business Education vol: 7 issue: 3 first page: 526 year: 2024
doi: 10.35564/jmbe.2024.0029
5. Soft skills, do we know what we are talking about?
Sara Isabel Marin-Zapata, Juan Pablo Román-Calderón, Cristina Robledo-Ardila, Maria Alejandra Jaramillo-Serna
Review of Managerial Science vol: 16 issue: 4 first page: 969 year: 2022
doi: 10.1007/s11846-021-00474-9
6. Unleashing the role of e-learning in student engagement practices and accounting professional competencies
Munther Al-Nimer, Ghaith Alsheikh
Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education vol: 14 issue: 2 first page: 829 year: 2022
doi: 10.1108/JARHE-10-2020-0377
7. South African business rescue regime
Frank Ranganai Matenda, Mabutho Sibanda, Bomi Cyril Nomlala, Zamanguni Hariatah Gumede
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147- 4478) vol: 12 issue: 2 first page: 100 year: 2023
doi: 10.20525/ijrbs.v12i2.2326
8. Methodological Considerations in the Professional Accreditation Research
Onesmus Ayaya, Marius Pretorius
Sage Open vol: 11 issue: 4 year: 2021
doi: 10.1177/21582440211052557