Original Research
The association between corporate social responsibility reporting and firm value for South African firms
Submitted: 05 December 2017 | Published: 28 August 2018
About the author(s)
Riana Horn, Department of Financial Accounting, University of South Africa, South AfricaMarna de Klerk, Department of Accounting, University of Pretoria, South Africa
Charl de Villiers, Department of Accounting, University of Pretoria, South Africa; Graduate School of Management, University of Auckland, New Zealand
Abstract
Background: Corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure is widespread among the largest companies in South Africa due to the listing requirements of the Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE). These companies have also increasingly pursued external assurance of their CSR disclosures in recent years. The increased regulation of CSR disclosure and the increased rate of obtaining assurance of these disclosures motivated us to perform our study.
Aim: To examine the association between CSR reporting, including both CSR disclosure and CSR assurance, and firm value of large South African companies.
Setting: The JSE listing requirements place South Africa, the setting for our study, at the forefront of corporate governance and CSR reporting.
Method: Tobin’s Q is used as a measure of firm value. Three measures of CSR disclosure and three of CSR assurance are used in this study. The measures are based on data collected by Klynveld Peat Marwick Goerdeler (KPMG) International on the CSR reporting practices of large South African companies. The sample period for this study coincides with the sample period covered in the KPMG surveys conducted during 2008, 2011 and 2013.
Results: No significant association is found between CSR disclosure and firm value. However, a significant negative association is found between CSR assurance and firm value. Additional analysis found that the negative association between firm value and CSR assurance is more significant for companies that are not listed on the Socially Responsible Investment (SRI) index.
Conclusion: The results found between CSR disclosure and firm value may suggest that firm value is unaffected by CSR disclosures. Taken together, the findings on CSR assurance and firm value and the additional analysis may suggest that in South Africa managers with negative CSR issues are more likely to obtain assurance on their CSR disclosure. The findings may be of interest to regulators when considering current and future disclosure and assurance requirements for CSR reporting in South Africa, as well as other parts of the world, shareholders when considering investment options, and managers when considering the benefit of certain CSR reporting practices.
Keywords
Metrics
Total abstract views: 4767Total article views: 7093
Crossref Citations
1. How Important Is Corporate Social Responsibility for Corporate Financial Performance?: A Machine Learning Prediction and Model Interpretability Approach
Ephraim Kwashie Thompson, Samuel Buertey, So‐Yeun Kim
Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility vol: 35 issue: 2 first page: 895 year: 2026
doi: 10.1111/beer.12820
2. Integrated reporting: A cross-cutting theoretical view on its use and value
Cornelis T. van der Lugt, Nadia Mans-Kemp
Journal of Economic and Financial Sciences vol: 15 issue: 1 year: 2022
doi: 10.4102/jef.v15i1.703
3. Integrated reporting education and hegemonic domination
Karin Barac, Pieter Conradie, Rene L. de Klerk
Journal of Economic and Financial Sciences vol: 13 issue: 1 year: 2020
doi: 10.4102/jef.v13i1.534
4. Materiality in reporting integration in South Africa: A natural language processing analysis
Cornelis T. Van der Lugt, Hans-Peter Bakker, Nadia Mans-Kemp
South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences vol: 28 issue: 1 year: 2025
doi: 10.4102/sajems.v28i1.5717
5. Disclosure of CSR Performance and Firm Value: New Evidence from South Africa on the Basis of the GRI Guidelines for Sustainability Disclosure
Frank Sampong, Na Song, Kingsley Osei Boahene, Kwame Ansong Wadie
Sustainability vol: 10 issue: 12 first page: 4518 year: 2018
doi: 10.3390/su10124518
6. Institutional pressures and the accounting and reporting of environmental liabilities
Minga Negash, Tesfaye T. Lemma
Business Strategy and the Environment vol: 29 issue: 5 first page: 1941 year: 2020
doi: 10.1002/bse.2480
7. Assessing the business case for environmental, social and corporate governance practices in South Africa
Ruth Johnson, Nadia Mans-Kemp, Pierre D. Erasmus
South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences vol: 22 issue: 1 year: 2019
doi: 10.4102/sajems.v22i1.2727
8. Linking integrated reporting quality with sustainability performance and financial performance in South Africa
Nadia Mans-Kemp, Cornelis T. Van der Lugt
South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences vol: 23 issue: 1 year: 2020
doi: 10.4102/sajems.v23i1.3572
9. CSR transparency and firm value: Is the connection differential for cost leaders and differentiators?
Muath Abdelqader, Ali Uyar, Cemil Kuzey
Journal of Cleaner Production vol: 443 first page: 141102 year: 2024
doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141102
10. Choice and impact of sustainability assurance standards on firm value
Sunita S. Rao, Siva Nathan, Norma Juma
Corporate Ownership and Control vol: 19 issue: 2 first page: 127 year: 2022
doi: 10.22495/cocv19i2art11
11. Regulations on Non-Financial Disclosure in Corporate Reporting: A Thematic Review
Nurul Jannah Mustafa Khan, Hasani Mohd Ali
Sustainability vol: 15 issue: 3 first page: 2793 year: 2023
doi: 10.3390/su15032793