Original Research
Investigating aspects of the capital budgeting process used in the evaluation of investment projects
South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences | Vol 3, No 3 | a2651 |
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/sajems.v3i3.2651
| © 2018 F. J. Scholtz
| This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 06 July 2018 | Published: 30 September 2000
Submitted: 06 July 2018 | Published: 30 September 2000
About the author(s)
J. H. Hall, Department of Accounting and Finance, University of Pretoria, South AfricaFull Text:
PDF (636KB)Abstract
Given the importance of capital investment, not only for the country as a whole but the creation of shareholder wealth by individual firms, it is vital to investigate the practices used to evaluate these projects. The findings of this study suggest that the most important stages in the capital budgeting process are project definition and cash flow estimation, not financial analysis. Further, in the evaluation of capital investment projects, South African companies seem to prefer Return on Investment and Internal Rate of Return as methods to determine the feasibility of a project. The use of these methods is influenced by the size of a company's annual capital budget, as there is a correlation between a company's annual capital budget and a preference for these methods.
Keywords
No related keywords in the metadata.
Metrics
Total abstract views: 1556Total article views: 652
Crossref Citations
1. Capital budgeting practices: an empirical study of listed small en medium enterprises
John H. Hall, Thabani Sibanda
Corporate Ownership and Control vol: 13 issue: 3 first page: 199 year: 2016
doi: 10.22495/cocv13i3c1p6