Original Research

Investigating aspects of the capital budgeting process used in the evaluation of investment projects

J. H. Hall
South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences | Vol 3, No 3 | a2651 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/sajems.v3i3.2651 | © 2018 Copyright Status: Not provided. Contact Holding Institution to verify copyright status. Rights Holder: University of Pretoria
Submitted: 06 July 2018 | Published: 30 September 2000

About the author(s)

J. H. Hall, Department of Accounting and Finance, University of Pretoria, South Africa

Full Text:

PDF (636KB)

Abstract

Given the importance of capital investment, not only for the country as a whole but the creation of shareholder wealth by individual firms, it is vital to investigate the practices used to evaluate these projects. The findings of this study suggest that the most important stages in the capital budgeting process are project definition and cash flow estimation, not financial analysis. Further, in the evaluation of capital investment projects, South African companies seem to prefer Return on Investment and Internal Rate of Return as methods to determine the feasibility of a project. The use of these methods is influenced by the size of a company's annual capital budget, as there is a correlation between a company's annual capital budget and a preference for these methods.

Keywords

No related keywords in the metadata.

Metrics

Total abstract views: 3182
Total article views: 2310

 

Crossref Citations

1. Capital budgeting practices: an empirical study of listed small en medium enterprises
John H. Hall, Thabani Sibanda
Corporate Ownership and Control  vol: 13  issue: 3  first page: 199  year: 2016  
doi: 10.22495/cocv13i3c1p6

2. Capital budgeting practices in Indian companies
Roopali Batra, Satish Verma
IIMB Management Review  vol: 29  issue: 1  first page: 29  year: 2017  
doi: 10.1016/j.iimb.2017.02.001

3. An analysis of capital budgeting methods, the cost of capital and decision-makers in listed South African firms
John H. Hall
Corporate Ownership and Control  vol: 9  issue: 2  first page: 519  year: 2012  
doi: 10.22495/cocv9i2c5art7

4. Real Options for IFRS-S1 and S2 2024 Mandatory Disclosures: An Alternative Approach to Capital Budgeting Valuation
Victor Manuel Castillo Delgadillo, Luz del Carmen Díaz-Peña
Journal of Risk and Financial Management  vol: 18  issue: 10  first page: 540  year: 2025  
doi: 10.3390/jrfm18100540

5. Capital budgeting techniques employed by selected South African state-owned companies
John H. Hall, T. Mutshutshu
Corporate Ownership and Control  vol: 10  issue: 3  first page: 177  year: 2013  
doi: 10.22495/cocv10i3c1art2

6. An Empirical Insight into Different Stages of Capital Budgeting
Roopali Batra, Satish Verma
Global Business Review  vol: 15  issue: 2  first page: 339  year: 2014  
doi: 10.1177/0972150914523588

7. The evolution of the application of capital budgeting techniques in enterprises
Simiso Siziba, John Henry Hall
Global Finance Journal  vol: 47  first page: 100504  year: 2021  
doi: 10.1016/j.gfj.2019.100504

8. Capital budgeting practices: evidence from Sri Lanka
Mohamed Nurullah, Lingesiya Kengatharan
Journal of Advances in Management Research  vol: 12  issue: 1  first page: 55  year: 2015  
doi: 10.1108/JAMR-01-2014-0004