Original Research
Direct use values of selected vegetation resources in the Okavango delta wetland
Submitted: 22 August 2011 | Published: 22 August 2011
About the author(s)
G Mmopelwa, University of Pretoria, South AfricaJames Blignaut, University of Pretoria, South Africa
Rashid Hassan, University of Pretoria
Full Text:
PDF (529KB)Abstract
The economic benefits generated by wetlands and the costs associated with their degradation or loss are frequently overlooked. This often leads to decisions that stimulate wetland conversion and degradation. An important step towards correcting this situation and countering this neglect is to establish the true values of a wetland’s ecosystem goods and services. This study attempts to estimate the direct use values of native plants, such as palm leaves for basketry, grass for thatching, fuelwood, edible fruits and plant parts used by three villages adjacent to the Okavango Delta during the 2003 calendar year. Other sources of ecosystem goods and services, such as fishing, floodplain farming and tourism, were not considered in this study. The average annual value per household of these harvested resources is generally higher than that of similar resources found in other southern African wetlands, owing to higher consumption rates. The overall total direct use value of plant resources, including household income contributions “in kind”, was estimated at US$1 434 per household for 2003 (or US$43.41/ha). This value is almost equal to the average household financial income of US$1 416/year. The net present value of the overall benefit from the direct use of the vegetative resources is estimated at US$101.9 million. This clearly indicates the value of the use of natural resources and their contribution to livelihoods and quality of life. This value is so significant that economic development planners ought to incorporate it into development planning. They should not conceive infrastructure development that would jeopardise the communities’ access to these natural resources without any well-developed mitigation strategy.
Keywords
Metrics
Total abstract views: 5145Total article views: 3732
Crossref Citations
1. Natural resource use, income and dependence among San and Mier communities bordering Kgalagadi Transfrontier Park, southern Kalahari, South Africa
Gladman Thondhlana, Pål Vedeld, Sheona Shackleton
International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology vol: 19 issue: 5 first page: 460 year: 2012
doi: 10.1080/13504509.2012.708908
2. Dependence on environmental resources and implications for household welfare: Evidence from the Kalahari drylands, South Africa
Gladman Thondhlana, Edwin Muchapondwa
Ecological Economics vol: 108 first page: 59 year: 2014
doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.10.003
3. Community-based natural resource use and management of Bigodi Wetland Sanctuary, Uganda, for livelihood benefits
A. Gosling, Charlie M. Shackleton, J. Gambiza
Wetlands Ecology and Management vol: 25 issue: 6 first page: 717 year: 2017
doi: 10.1007/s11273-017-9546-y
4. The roles, significance and sustainability of wild plant and fungal non-timber forest product use in southern Africa: a systematic review
Shackleton CM, Cocks ML, Maroyi A, Ntshanga N, Twine WC
South African Journal of Botany vol: 184 first page: 1386 year: 2025
doi: 10.1016/j.sajb.2025.07.029
5. The Village, the Elephant, and the State: Land Access and Vulnerability in Rural Botswana
Lauren Redmore, Ipolokeng Katholo, Aby Sene-Harper, Anna Songhurst, Graham McCulloch, Amanda Stronza
Human Ecology vol: 51 issue: 2 first page: 237 year: 2023
doi: 10.1007/s10745-023-00390-4
6. Mapping and valuation of South Africa's ecosystem services: A local perspective
J.K. Turpie, K.J. Forsythe, A. Knowles, J. Blignaut, G. Letley
Ecosystem Services vol: 27 first page: 179 year: 2017
doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.07.008
7. Economic Development and South Africa: 25 Years Analysis (1994 to 2019)
Pavitra Dhamija
South African Journal of Economics vol: 88 issue: 3 first page: 298 year: 2020
doi: 10.1111/saje.12248