Original Research

ESG and bank stability in Gulf Cooperation Council countries: Empirical evidence from listed commercial banks

Ibrahim N. Khatatbeh, Mohammad Tayeh, Abdelrazaq F. Freihat, Raneem G. Aldeki
South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences | Vol 28, No 1 | a6287 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/sajems.v28i1.6287 | © 2025 Ibrahim N. Khatatbeh, Mohammad Tayeh, Abdelrazaq F. Freihat, Raneem G. Aldeki | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 11 May 2025 | Published: 16 September 2025

About the author(s)

Ibrahim N. Khatatbeh, Department of Banking and Financial Sciences, Business School, The Hashemite University, Zarqa, Jordan
Mohammad Tayeh, Department of Finance, School of Business, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
Abdelrazaq F. Freihat, Department of Accounting, Faculty of Business, Al-Balqa Applied University, Al Salt, Jordan
Raneem G. Aldeki, Department of Banks and Financial Institutions, School of Business, Al-Sham Private University, Damascus, Syrian Arab Republic; and, Finance, Investment, and Banking Department, Faculty of Business Administration, Arab International University, Damascus, Syrian Arab Republic

Abstract

Background: Environmental, social and governance (ESG) practices are increasingly integrated into banking. However, their effects on financial stability remain inconclusive, particularly in oil-dependent economies like those of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries.
Aim: This study investigated the effect of ESG scores on bank stability in the GCC countries. It also evaluates the role of economic freedom and the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in shaping this relationship.
Setting: The study focused on 40 listed commercial banks across six GCC countries, over the period 2018–2023.
Method: Using panel data, the study applied a two-step system generalised method of moment (GMM) estimator. Bank stability is proxied by the logarithm of the Z-score, while ESG performance is measured through aggregate and pillar-specific scores (environmental, social, governance) from Bloomberg.
Results: The results reveal a statistically significant negative effect of the ESG pillars on bank stability. For instance, a 1-point increase in the environmental score is expected to lead to a 0.003 decrease in bank stability. Moreover, higher levels of economic freedom are associated with increased bank stability. Similarly, bank size, inflation and economic growth are key favourable contributors to bank stability. Additional analysis reveals that COVID-19 had a damaging effect on bank stability.
Conclusion: ESG integration in GCC banks may reduce short-term stability because of high implementation costs. Economic and regulatory contexts significantly influence the ESG-stability link.
Contribution: This study provides context-specific evidence on ESG impacts in emerging markets, offering insights for policymakers and banking institutions in shaping long-term sustainable finance strategies.


Keywords

ESG; economic freedom; bank stability; sustainability; GCC; GMM.

JEL Codes

G21: Banks • Depository Institutions • Micro Finance Institutions • Mortgages; O16: Financial Markets • Saving and Capital Investment • Corporate Finance and Governance; Q56: Environment and Development • Environment and Trade • Sustainability • Environmental Accounts and Accounting • Environmental Equity • Population Growth

Sustainable Development Goal

Goal 8: Decent work and economic growth

Metrics

Total abstract views: 1053
Total article views: 1332


Crossref Citations

No related citations found.