Email this article 
Hide
Show all
Original Research
The economic and environmental effects of a carbon tax in South Africa: A dynamic CGE modelling approach
Submitted: 03 May 2016 | Published: 09 December 2016
About the author(s)
Jan Van Heerden, University of Pretoria, South AfricaJames Blignaut, University of Pretoria, South Africa
Heinrich Bohlmann, University of Pretoria, South Africa
Anton Cartwright, African Centre of Cities, University of Cape Town
Nicci Diederichs, Futureworks Consulting
Myles Mander, Futureworks Consulting
Full Text:
PDF (729KB)Abstract
The economic and environmental effects of a carbon tax in South Africa: A dynamic cge modelling approach
South Africa’s National Treasury released its Carbon Tax Policy Paper in May 2013. The paper proposed a R120/tCO2-equiv. levy on coal, gas and petroleum fuels. Here, we model the possible impacts of such a tax on the South African economy using the computable general equilibrium (CGE) 53-sector model of the University of Pretoria’s Department of Economics. The model shows that the carbon tax has the capacity to decrease South Africa’s greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by between 1 900MtCO2-equiv. and 2 300MtCO2-equiv. between 2016 and 2035. The extent of emissions reductions is most sensitive to the rate at which tax exemptions are removed. Recycling of carbon tax revenue reduces the extent of emissions reductions due to the fact that economic growth is supported. The manner in which carbon tax revenue is recycled back into the economy is therefore important in terms of the extent of emissions reductions achieved, but not as significant as the influence of different exemption schedules. The model shows the carbon tax to have a net negative impact on South Africa’s gross domestic product (GDP) relative to the baseline under all exemption regimes and all revenue recycling options assessed. The negative impact of the carbon tax on GDP is, however, greatly reduced by the manner in which the tax revenue is recycled. Recycling in the form of a production subsidy for all industries results in the lowest negative impact on GDP.
Keywords
Metrics
Total abstract views: 6746Total article views: 2131
Crossref Citations
1. Equality and efficiency tradeoffs in revenue recycling of emission trading scheme: a case study on the recent chinese national ETS market
Shuyang Chen
Environment, Development and Sustainability year: 2024
doi: 10.1007/s10668-024-05380-0
2. Distributional impacts of taxing water pollution in the Olifants river basin of South Africa
Clement Kweku Kyei, Rashid Hassan
Development Southern Africa vol: 38 issue: 6 first page: 1001 year: 2021
doi: 10.1080/0376835X.2021.1932425
3. Environmental, economic, and social impact of five COP26 policies: A computable general equilibrium analysis for Canada
Rahim Zahedi, Alireza Aslani
Energy Science & Engineering vol: 11 issue: 8 first page: 2690 year: 2023
doi: 10.1002/ese3.1481
4. Welfare impacts of introducing water pollution tax in the Olifants river basin in South Africa: A revisited analysis using a top-down micro-accounting approach
Clement Kweku Kyei, Margaret Chitiga-Mabugu
Agrekon vol: 60 issue: 3 first page: 253 year: 2021
doi: 10.1080/03031853.2021.1937245
5. Research on the articulated coupling effect of carbon tax policy under resource endowment in China
Kanghui Zhang, Long Lu
Environmental Science and Pollution Research vol: 30 issue: 21 first page: 60240 year: 2023
doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-26732-9
6. Development of the electricity-environmental policy CGE model (GTAP-E-PowerS): A case of the carbon tax in South Africa
Duy Nong
Energy Policy vol: 140 first page: 111375 year: 2020
doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111375
7. Carbon Taxes
Govinda R. Timilsina
Journal of Economic Literature vol: 60 issue: 4 first page: 1456 year: 2022
doi: 10.1257/jel.20211560
8. Greening the South Africa’s Economy Could Benefit the Food Sector: Evidence from a Carbon Tax Policy Assessment
Sifiso M. Ntombela, Heinrich R. Bohlmann, Mmatlou W. Kalaba
Environmental and Resource Economics vol: 74 issue: 2 first page: 891 year: 2019
doi: 10.1007/s10640-019-00352-9
9. Economic, Environmental and Social Impact of Carbon Tax for Iran: A Computable General Equilibrium Analysis
Seyed Farhan Moosavian, Rahim Zahedi, Ahmad Hajinezhad
Energy Science & Engineering vol: 10 issue: 1 first page: 13 year: 2022
doi: 10.1002/ese3.1005
10. Green Growth Intervention on Employment Generation in India
Anandajit Goswami, Saswata Chaudhury
International Journal of Sustainable Entrepreneurship and Corporate Social Responsibility vol: 2 issue: 2 first page: 39 year: 2017
doi: 10.4018/IJSECSR.2017070103
11. Managing the trade-off between economic growth and protection of environmental quality: the case of taxing water pollution in the Olifants river basin of South Africa
Clement Kyei, Rashid Hassan
Water Policy vol: 21 issue: 2 first page: 277 year: 2019
doi: 10.2166/wp.2019.190
12. A Summary of the Research on the Implementation Effect of Green Tax System
翠香 田
Frontiers of International Accounting vol: 12 issue: 04 first page: 429 year: 2023
doi: 10.12677/FIA.2023.124057
13. Risk and self-optimization analysis of the carbon tax policy based on scenario simulation
Kanghui Zhang, Long Lu
Environmental Research Communications vol: 5 issue: 12 first page: 125004 year: 2023
doi: 10.1088/2515-7620/ad10e6
14. Does green policy pay dividends?
Nusrate Aziz, Belayet Hossain, Laura Lamb
Environmental Economics and Policy Studies vol: 24 issue: 2 first page: 147 year: 2022
doi: 10.1007/s10018-021-00317-7
15. Cumulative effects of energy and water economic policies: Framework development and a case study in China
Yuanyuan Sun, Chunling Li, Yuetong Jing
Journal of Cleaner Production vol: 469 first page: 143116 year: 2024
doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.143116
16. Just Energy Transition of South Africa in a Post-COVID Era
Heinrich R. Bohlmann, Jessika A. Bohlmann, Margaret Chitiga-Mabugu, Roula Inglesi-Lotz
Sustainability vol: 15 issue: 14 first page: 10854 year: 2023
doi: 10.3390/su151410854
17. Efficiency–equity trade-off in the Irish carbon tax: A CGE investigation of mixed revenue recycling schemes
Kelly de Bruin, Aykut Mert Yakut
Economic Modelling vol: 134 first page: 106705 year: 2024
doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2024.106705
18. A sustainable decarbonisation roadmap for South African priority agro-processing sub-sectors
Clint Alex Steed, Bradley Shawn Mercuur, Mia Mangaroo-Pilllay
Energy for Sustainable Development vol: 88 first page: 101788 year: 2025
doi: 10.1016/j.esd.2025.101788
19. Greenhouse gas emissions vs CO2 emissions: Comparative analysis of a global carbon tax
Duy Nong, Paul Simshauser, Duong Binh Nguyen
Applied Energy vol: 298 first page: 117223 year: 2021
doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117223
20. Analysis of carbon tax efficiency in energy industries of selected EU countries
Miroslav Hájek, Jarmila Zimmermannová, Karel Helman, Ladislav Rozenský
Energy Policy vol: 134 first page: 110955 year: 2019
doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.110955
21. Economic and social effectiveness of carbon pricing schemes to meet Brazilian NDC targets
William Wills, Emilio Lebre La Rovere, Carolina Grottera, Giovanna Ferrazzo Naspolini, Gaëlle Le Treut, Frédéric Ghersi, Julien Lefèvre, Carolina Burle Schmidt Dubeux
Climate Policy vol: 22 issue: 1 first page: 48 year: 2022
doi: 10.1080/14693062.2021.1981212
22. Regional employment and economic growth effects of South Africa’s transition to low-carbon energy supply mix
H.R. Bohlmann, J.M. Horridge, R. Inglesi-Lotz, E.L. Roos, L. Stander
Energy Policy vol: 128 first page: 830 year: 2019
doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.01.065
23. The possible macroeconomic and sectoral impacts of carbon taxation on Turkey’s economy: A computable general equilibrium analyses
Levent Aydın
Energy & Environment vol: 29 issue: 5 first page: 784 year: 2018
doi: 10.1177/0958305X18759920
24. Decarbonizing Economies: Balancing Growth and Green in South Africa, Mozambique, the United Kingdom and Sweden
J. Ndlovu, K. Sekome, O. Fourie
World Tax Journal vol: 17 issue: 1 year: 2025
doi: 10.59403/2gv8jb8