Original Research
The Whig interpretation of history
South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences | Vol 3, No 1 | a2598 |
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/sajems.v3i1.2598
| © 2018 Christopher Torr
| This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 04 July 2018 | Published: 31 March 2000
Submitted: 04 July 2018 | Published: 31 March 2000
About the author(s)
Christopher Torr, Department of Economics, University of South Africa, South AfricaFull Text:
PDF (328KB)Abstract
In economics, as in other disciplines, one often comes across the term "Whig" or its derivatives. One will find, for example, a particular account being branded as whiggish. Butterfield, who was a historian, introduced the idea of a Whig interpretation of history in 1931. Since then the term has usually been used to classify an approach which views the present as the culmination of a march of progress. This paper provides a brief background to the origin of the term and why Butterfield criticised what he called the Whig interpretation of history.
Keywords
No related keywords in the metadata.
Metrics
Total abstract views: 1287Total article views: 509