Original Research
An analysis of South Africa’s guidance on the income tax consequences of crypto assets
Submitted: 15 September 2022 | Published: 28 February 2023
About the author(s)
Namhla Vumazonke, College of Accounting, Faculty of Commerce, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South AfricaShaun Parsons, College of Accounting, Faculty of Commerce, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
Abstract
Background: A media statement issued by the South African Revenue Service (SARS) in 2018 represents the primary guidance available to South African taxpayers on the income tax consequences of crypto asset transactions.
Aim: This study assessed the adequacy of the guidelines available to South African taxpayers on the consequences of crypto asset transactions, and identified the income tax consequences for transactions not addressed in these guidelines.
Setting: This study compared the scope and depth of the SARS guidelines to guidance issued in other jurisdictions. This distinguishes it from other studies focusing on the theoretical income tax consequences of crypto asset transactions.
Method: The first phase of the study was an in-depth documental analysis to benchmark the SARS guidelines against the guidance of tax authorities in other jurisdictions. In the second phase of the study, a doctrinal legal research methodology was adopted to identify the income tax consequences of transactions not addressed by SARS, applying existing legislation and case law, and taking into account the guidance of the other selected tax authorities.
Results: The study found that the SARS guidelines did not comprehensively address all the crypto asset transactions addressed by the other selected tax authorities.
Conclusion: The study recommended that SARS provide comprehensive guidance to South African taxpayers on the income tax consequences of crypto asset transactions, the development of which would be supported by consequences identified in this study.
Contribution: This study contributes to the understanding of, and development of taxpayer guidance to address the income tax consequences of crypto asset transactions in South Africa.
Keywords
JEL Codes
Sustainable Development Goal
Metrics
Total abstract views: 4172Total article views: 7176
Crossref Citations
1. Bridging Regulation and Innovation: A Systematic Review of Cryptocurrency Taxation and Fiscal Policy (2020–2025)
Rosario Violeta Grijalva-Salazar, Jose Antonio Caicedo-Mendoza, Arturo Jaime Zúñiga-Castillo, Erikson Olivas-Valencia, Víctor Hugo Fernández-Bedoya
Journal of Risk and Financial Management vol: 18 issue: 12 first page: 720 year: 2025
doi: 10.3390/jrfm18120720
2. Cryptocurrency Taxation: A Bibliometric Analysis and Emerging Trends
Georgiana-Iulia Lazea, Maria-Roxana Balea-Stanciu, Ovidiu-Constantin Bunget, Anca-Diana Sumănaru, Ana-Maria Georgiana Coraș
International Journal of Financial Studies vol: 13 issue: 1 first page: 37 year: 2025
doi: 10.3390/ijfs13010037
3. Cryptocurrencies’ Impact on Accounting: Bibliometric Review
Georgiana-Iulia Lazea, Ovidiu-Constantin Bunget, Cristian Lungu
Risks vol: 12 issue: 6 first page: 94 year: 2024
doi: 10.3390/risks12060094
4. Machine Learning Approach for Emotion Identification and Classification in Bitcoin Sentiment Analysis
Erol Kına, Emre Biçek
Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi vol: 29 issue: 3 first page: 913 year: 2024
doi: 10.53433/yyufbed.1532649
5. Blockchain Forensics and Regulatory Technology for Crypto Tax Compliance: A State-of-the-Art Review and Emerging Directions in the South African Context
Pardon Takalani Ramazhamba, Hein Venter
Applied Sciences vol: 16 issue: 2 first page: 799 year: 2026
doi: 10.3390/app16020799
6. Bitcoin, cryptocurrencies and tax evasion: A systematic literature review on global approaches to cryptocurrency taxation and the challenges for harmonising regulatory frameworks
Eva Kicova, Juraj Fabus, Natalia Stalmasekova, Terezia Kvasnicova-Galovicova
Data Science in Finance and Economics vol: 5 issue: 2 first page: 234 year: 2025
doi: 10.3934/DSFE.2025011